Growth & Justice Blog

Top priority for transitway development should be employers and jobs

You are a policy-maker and you have a tough choice between  two major development proposals for the same site on a major light-rail line or transitway.   All things being equal, which do you choose:  a major employer or a large housing complex?

If overall accessibility improvement and employer access to labor is the goal, take the employer, says new research presented this week at the 23rd Annual Transportation Research Conference in St. Paul this week.   

The research by University of Minnesota Humphrey School Assistant Professor Yingling Fan was complex and aimed at planning professionals.   But the bottom-line key finding was straightforward:  "Locating new jobs near transitways produces larger increases in accessibility than locating new housing near transitways.''   Getting these fundamentals right are important because by 2030 we likely will have an integrated network of 14 transitways up and running in the Twin Cities, ranging from light-rail to commuter rail to express bus lines.   Few public investments are more important for business growth than transporation infractructure.   Equally important is better access for a workforce that is increasingly comprised of low- and middle-income communities of color, and who need much better connectivity to jobs in the new economy. 

Fan's research was sponsored by the McKnight Foundation, the Jay & Rose Phillips Foundation and the Surdna Foundation.   Abstracts from the conference provide rich state-of-the-art thinking on a wide array of transportation investment issues.

 

Dane Smith

 

St. Paul resident and son inspecting Central Corridor construction in downtown St. Paul (Metropolitan Council photo)

Recommended Reading: Ember Reichgott Junge on charter schools, and John Watson Milton on Senate Majority Leader Nick Coleman Sr.

For lovers of Minnesota, for history buffs and for students and practitioners of public policy, I highly recommend two outstanding books released this week.

One is "Zero Chance of Passage: The Pioneering Charter School Story,'' by former state Sen. Ember Reichgott Junge, a key state leader in education, human services, and governmental redesign and a primary champion of the school-choice and charter school movement of the 1980s and 1990s.  Reichgott Junge skillfully weaves the story of emerging education innovation in Minnesota, from the influence of union leader Albert Shanker, through Gov. Rudy Perpich's bold effort to push through public-school choice, to her own championing of the fights for post-secondary options and finally, Minnesota's emergence as the leading model state in the charter school movement.   Controversy still surrounds charter schools, but they are here to stay, and I'm personally glad that this option was available when my own daughter sought an alternative to her big public high school a few years ago.  (If you buy the book online between 2 p.m. and 3 p.m.on May 9, Ember tells me, there's a chance amazon.com will help with promotion.) 

The other is "For the Good of the Order: Nick Coleman and the High Tide of Liberal Politics in Minnesota, 1971-81,''  by former state Sen.  John Watson Milton, and who served with Majority Leader Coleman in a heyday of progressive reform.   This golden decade, in which Coleman arguably had more influence than any other leader, stretched from the Minnesota Miracle and greater state responsibility for education funding and quality,  to putting teeth in civil rights legislation and expanding the rights of women and minorities and gays and lesbians, to campaign finance reform, to environmental cleanups, to progressive tax overhauls.   As former vice-president Walter F. Mondale writes in the foreword:   "In many ways, (Coleman) and Roger Moe, his successor as Senate majority leader, were more important than many governors we've had _ lasting longer, creating a revolution, and elevating the legislative branch to an equal footing with the executive...Nick Coleman was one of the brightest and most effective people in public office I've ever known.''

Both books will serve as reference works for years to come.   And they are a reminder of what's possible in our political process, and an inspiration for future stewards of our state government.

 

Dane Smith

 

A statement for government redesign, goal-setting, and budgeting for outcomes

Few voices reflect Minnesota's moderate mainstream ethics more perfectly than Star Tribune editorial columnist Lori Sturdevant, and her call-to-action for government "redesigners'' in Sunday's Star Tribune Op-Ex was squarely on target.

 

And this morning Sturdevant hit the note again with a short editorial page item describing a discussion group on redesign that we at Growth & Justice have been part of for a year-and-a-half now. The nucleus of the informal ad hoc group is comprised of current and former presidents of the Citizens League, long considered a premiere civic improvement organization in the Twin Cities and Minnesota. The discussion group includes key leaders in the business community, from nonprofits and foundations and from the conservative think tank, the Center of the American Experiment. Much of the spirit and substance of the group's deliberations can be found on the pages of the Civic Caucus website.

 

Last week as the state government shutdown dragged on and a mutually unsatisfactory budget deal unfolded, our group produced a strong statement urging a commitment and offering specifics toward redesigning our governmental systems.

 

The statement is being shared with top leaders in the executive and legislative branch and will be districtuted broadly in coming days and weeks. Despair and cynicism about our political gridlock is undesrtandable but unnecessary. Recently I wrote a Capitol Report column noting that these actually are not the worst of times, and urging that we emerge from them with a commitment to redesign and invest in better government and measurable results. We can begin, for instance, by setting a 75 percent post-secondary completion goal for our young adults by the end of this decade, which is a top Growth & Justice policy objective.

 

The good news is that on many fronts conscientious Minnesotans, both inside and outside state and local government and in our state employee labor unions, are already working to improve our vital public investments. Let's encourage much more of that, and keep our minds open.

 

--Dane Smith

Antidote for cynicism: Celebrate the Happy Warrior on May 27th, Humphrey Birthday Centennial Reunion & Policy Discussions

For a bracing antidote to the current cynicism about our ability to solve problems with our own democracy, mark your calendars and reserve your spot for May 27 and particpate in an all-day commemoration of the life of Minnesota's own immortal Hubert H. Humphrey (details at bottom of post).

That date will mark the 100th anniversary of the birthday of "The Happy Warrior," as he frequently was called.  An enriching and rather cerebral celebration is being planned at Minneapolis City Hall.  That's where Humphrey began his political career, as mayor, more than 60 years ago.  The agenda is policy-centered and forward-looking with breakouts for discussions on future directions for progressive policy.

Humphrey, who became vice-president in the 1960s and who came within a whisker of the presidency himself, should forever be a point of pride for all Minnesotans.  He was so beloved by friend and foe that he lay in state in the national Capitol Rotunda on his death.  And in hindsight his legacy can be apprecated by citizens of all political hues, not just his liberal admirers.  Humphrey improved our Twin Cities and our nation and our world -- starting with his battles against rank corruption and anti-Semitism in Minneapolis, continuing with his epochal co-leadership of the Civil Rights movement in the U.S. Senate, his steadfast Cold War resolve against brutal communist dictatorships, and his seminal roles in initiatives ranging from Medicare, to the Peace Corps, to workplace safety and the Occupational Safety and Health Act.  (An authoritative and balanced mini-biography, one of the better treatments I've seen, is on the official U.S. Senate website.)  Conservative think-tanker Mitch Pearlstein and I wrote about parallels between Humphrey and Ronald Reagan (whose birthday centennial also occurs this year) in the Star Tribune a couple months ago.

Humphrey until his death from cancer in 1978 absolutely defined the role of the optimistic, practical and constructive political leader.  These are the qualities we want to develop not only in our elected officials, but ourselves.

-Dane Smith

P.S. Opening soon will be a website,  www.humphreycenntennial.org for registration and if you can't wait, reserve by sending an e-mail to humphreycentennial@hotmail.com.  Participants will be asked to provide, names (first & last), e-mail addresses, phone numbers and street address.  Checks should be written to "Humphrey Centennial" and snail mail address is Humphrey Centennial, 1600 University Avenue W., Suite 309B, Saint Paul, MN 55104.  Registering guests will be asked to name their top 3 discussion group issues from a list of:  The Future of American Workers; Citizens in Politics; U.S. in the World; Jobs; Family Farms;  Energy; Health & Aging; Learning & Information; 21st Century Governing; Liberty & Equality; News & Privacy.  Another option is to contact one of two organizers, Diane O'Brien, dianeobrien@me.com (651-261-4173) or Bob Meek, bmeek@tunheim.com, (651-239-7820).  Also, check out Facebook for Hubert H. Humphrey Birthday Centennial Reunion & Policy Discussions, http://www.facebook.com/event.php?eid=314995135445.

 

 

 

What if Ayn Rand had to dig her own two-holer?

(Note: We hereby introduce Chuck Brown - a former business manager, a former city council member for the southern Minnesota town of Olivia, and a novelist – as a guest blogger for Growth & Justice.)

Conservative columnist Jason Lewis’ professed love for Ayn Rand and her novel, Atlas Shrugged, (Star Tribune, Apr. 17) struck a chord with me, but probably not one he intended.

Rand has long been deified by those who use the worship of individualism and capitalism (see this NY Times summary of her influence on right-wing business leaders) to deny the notion of common good and the enormous value of that which we do collectively, i.e. through our good governments. But Lewis, like Rand, goes even further to suggest that anything done collectively or altruistically results in a loss of freedom. In Lewis’ world “productive thinkers” are to be valued to the extent that we dare not ask any sacrifice of them or seek to limit the windfalls from their achievements. “Productive thinkers” sounds a bit like today’s sainted “job creators” who, we are told, will take their bat and go home, or somewhere else, if the game isn’t played exactly by their rules.

I’m not against productive thought any more than I’m against job creation, though it occurs to me that we can also have productive thoughts and create jobs when we work together, Rand and Lewis notwithstanding. But my chief aim here is to dispute the notion that all collective acts result in a loss of freedom. I’ll begin with some very basic and personal observations.

The first thing I do when I get up in the morning is turn on the lights. The second thing I do…well, I won’t go into detail on the second thing, other than to say that it concludes with a flush. The third thing I do is turn on the water and brush my teeth. Now my point here is that the first three things I do each day involve a good or service that I purchase from government. Most folks may not buy electricity from a municipal utility, as I do, but many of us in rural Minnesota do, and our basic power supply throughout this nation is properly regulated by public agencies. And most of us now are hooked up to clean and efficient "government-run'' water and sewer systems. These are things we have chosen to do collectively, not because we are knee-jerk collectivists, but because it simply made the most sense. It was the best way to get that particular job done in a way that produced value for the largest number of people. Ayn Rand may have found digging her own well and having a two-holer in the backyard to be more to her philosophical liking, but I can’t see how she could claim that I’ve lost freedom by enjoying public works. I might even argue that the convenience of these systems adds freedom, granting me time for things I want to do rather than, say, dig my own two-holer.

Public safety and common good requires that we obey the law and pay taxes, but only criminals risk serious loss of freedom in our democracy. The rest of us enjoy the freedom of an orderly society ensured in large part by taxes and governments and public works. National defense, one of our largest collective "government-run'' endeavors, has as its primary focus the defense of our freedom. Then of course there’s public education, which accounts for about half our state-local tax dollars, and it’s hard to imagine how we might be freer without it. In fact, the sages tell us, education sets us free.

We Americans are exceptionally individualistic, and so Ayn Rand and rugged pioneers and cowboys will always be part of our thinking. But many of our greatest national achievements have been collective efforts, and that’s not likely to change, even in the land of the free.

-Chuck Brown

 

Governments innovate and improve all the time, and sometimes it makes the news

No news is good news, they say.  And in the news business, good news too often is NOT news, or sensational enough to display prominently.  But one distinctive cover page of the Star Tribune’s metro section earlier this month provided a refreshing exception.  The story at the top of the page revealed how nursing homes in the Ecumen chain are improving the quality of their residents’ lives by replacing sedative drugs with massage, music, games, aromatherapy, and other alternatives for pain and anxiety control, in a very encouraging project mostly  funded by a state government grant.  Another article on the page and a large photo described how the Burnsville Police Department is using body cameras instead of more expensive dashboard cameras,  to more quickly settle claims of excessive force and other disputes.  And a third article on the page explained how the city of North St. Paul was planning to save money and improve services by turning its recreational programs over to the neighboring city of Maplewood.  Our new governor and our new Legislature will be leaving no stones unturned in their search for better ways for our governments to do things and to save money.  It’s important to be aware that Minnesota already is blessed with a culture of good government, conscientious public employees and leaders, and a tradition of innovation in the public sector.  Mostly unheralded efforts like the above are occurring every day across the state.  All of us, as the actual bosses of our governments, need to be part of this.  You can add your two cents by contributing your thoughts to the Common Cents project , sponsored by the Citizens League and the Bush Foundation.  Check out their website for an interesting and robust discussion of the further things Minnesota can do with long-term care, with technology improvements and with consolidation and collaboration between governments.

Dane Smith

Check out "Soul of the Community,'' to see how Minnesotans love their amenities and aesthetics and public stuff

It's sometimes hard to get top business executives to locate to Minnesota -- what with the cold weather and progressive income taxes -- but once they've lived here awhile, it's even harder to get them to leave.  I've heard some version of that story many times in business quarters, most recently at a BioBusiness event in Rochester.

Those of us who have lived elsewhere have theories about this.  And my own conviction is that our attractiveness and our affection for this place is built on a stronger sense of community, inclusiveness and economic fairness than exists in other places.  We simply have had better public stuff, better schools, better parks and trails, better infrastructure overall, more publicly supported arts and cultural amenities, which all adds up to a state and cities that are classier and cooler than other places, not just colder (but I like that bracing climate too).  And in the end, it makes for a better business climate too, owing to a more productive and creative workforce.  More clues as to how this is true can be found in the Knight Foundation's lastest study, The Soul of the Community, which measures 26 U.S. cities from this refreshingtly distinct perspective:  how attached citizens are to their place, and why.  News articles on the study were published in the Star Tribune and the St. Paul Pioneer Press and the two papers offer interesting variations on the essential findings of the study.  Here's the bottom line of the report summary itself, as to why people become attached to their community:

While the economy is obviously the subject of much attention, the study has found that perceptions of the local economy do not have a very strong relationship to resident attachment.  Instead, attachment is most closely related to how accepting a community is of diversity, its wealth of social offerings, and its aesthetics.

And this excerpt from Chris Havens' STrib story adds a little texture to the analysis. 

St. Paul is a city that has welcomed poetry stamped into its sidewalks, a photography exhibit along bustling University Avenue and various music and ethnic festivals.  "It's a cool place to live," (Mayor Chris) Coleman said. "It's a unique place to live."  Sue Buchholz walked her Yorkie, Pandy, in downtown St. Paul's Rice Park on Monday. She moved into a downtown condo within the last year. "I knew this is where I wanted to be," she said. "There's always something to do."  She made a sweeping motion with her arm, pointing to the Central Library, Ordway Center for Performing Arts and Landmark Center.  A few blocks away runs the Mississippi River, which attracts joggers, bicyclists and others interested in the nature along the banks. There are more bike lanes and trails than ever before in the Twin Cities and suburbs.

We've known about this comparative advantage from our better public stuff  for some time.  We hope our new leaders in the governor's office and the Legislature do not lose sight of this bedrock economic asset when they begin to balance the budget shortfall next year.  (And by the way, the Knight report suggests that we are not that high in our regard for our leaders).

Dane Smith

 

 

 

 

Michael O'Keefe with budget wisdom

Michael O'Keefe was one of the standouts in  a highly respected state cabinet that came together to help neophyte Gov. Jesse Ventura in 1999, and O'Keefe served ably as commissioner of the Department of Human Services, one of the state's largest and most complex agencies.   He's also had a distinguished career as a foundation CEO  (McKnight) and a college president (Minneapolis College of Art and Design), and he has degrees in mathematics and physics.   So when he talks about state budget crisis realities, one really should pay attention.   Here are some of the standout excerpts from his recent interview with the Civic Caucus on the "Hard Realities of Minnesota's Budget Situation."

•  Address the problem with every tool in sight, but do not dig a deeper hole--O'Keefe described how he was in government for "good years," when they had extra money to spend. "Then we hit a bad year. The budget was good before the Legislature got a hold of it. Governor Ventura had actually put together a very reasonable plan that included some taxes and some cuts, and drew down some  state reserves with a strategy to replace them.
• "Offset medical costs by accepting federal Medicaid assistance, and find efficiencies--In the area of health, O'Keefe advocates taking the federal Medicaid money-over $1billion-"because one of our goals of a state is to have a safety net." The state really screwed up when it cut general assistance medical care, he said. Now minor conditions become chronic or more serious and people will show up at emergency rooms that cost someone--the state, the county, insured people-- much more than if they had received preventative care.
• The health care system will need a crisis to change--He has concerns about the system of care, and its methods of payment. "A third-party-payer marketplace is never going to work unless you have substantial restructuring. We have a system that rewards doctors on volume, on throughput," and on the cleverness of their support staff to classify what it is that went on in the exam room. He described a doctor who told him that whenever he performs a service he cuts and pastes a description for the service directly out of the Medicare guidebook, which guarantees he'll be reimbursed. Instead, O'Keefe said, the state needs more systems like Mayo where doctors are paid salaries.
  
• The state may not need two public post-secondary systems--A participant asked whether the state government really needs two higher education systems. "I don't think so," O'Keefe responded. "Take a look at the administrative over-structure-it's huge." O'Keefe described his hope that new leadership at the University and at MNSCU will be willing to engage in a discussion about reducing the aggregate administrative overhead, admitting that it would be enormously unpopular with their constituents but nevertheless needs to be done."
  
• Post-secondary costs are being driven up faster than inflation--Higher education costs have been rising at double the rate of inflation for 25 years, he said, and that's not sustainable. Part of the cost-driver has been on the administrative side, and part because of increased complication caused by increased requirements of the federal government. "But a huge increase has been a market phenomenon driven by students and families: they want more, and they're willing to pay for it."  Expectations have increased. "You can't sell a dorm room with three beds anymore. What students and their families want is an apartment suite with living area, kitchen, laundry etc. And, they're willing to pay for it. Witness private developers who are putting up such style dorms and making them profitable."  O'Keefe recalled many years ago that The George Washington University was considered "middling" in terms of quality. They brought in a consultant whose recommendation was that they double tuition. They increased it by 40 percent in the face of deep concern that  applications would go down; instead they went up by 60 percent. "People were willing to pay more because of the perception of quality implied by the higher tuition."
• Virtual education has significant, widespread potential--To a question about virtual education, O'Keefe said he thinks it has huge potential to bring students rich experiences without having to first bring them together in person. At the college of Art and Design he described a professor who taught via the internet from South Africa. The students were satisfied, he said, with a balance of internet-conferencing, faxing images to each other, and working face-to-face in groups on campus. "I was very surprised; it resulted in a quality experience." Even so, the application of technology has increased costs: "So far when new technologies have been added they haven't reduced costs, as some had promised. I'd argue you have to change the system of teaching for that to happen."

There's substantially more from O'Keefe on the Civic Caucus website,  including a provocative challenge to rethink  whether Minnesota's spending on prisons and lifetime incarceration of sex offenders can be sustained.   We're proud to have Michael on our board of directors at Growth & Justice and as a significant  influence on our policy thinking.

Dane Smith

TPT-TV broadcast of education reform "Minnesota Meeting'' is a must-see for education policy types

If you want to stay on the cutting edge of  Minnesota education policy debate in the coming months, you really must watch TPT-TV's broadcasts this week of a recent "Minnesota Meeting'' on education reform.

(It's a one-hour show, and will be broadcast five times in the coming week on TPT Minnesota Channel 2.2  or TPT Life Channel 2.3, click here for more detail on viewing times and digital access).   

The Minnesota Meeting, a perennial service of  The Minneapolis Foundation,  has been a valuable and intelligent civic forum that has addressed some of our state's biggest policy challenges.  The TPT video of the  June meeting, also sponsored by the Robins Kaplan Miller & Ciresi Foundation for Children, features a presentation by the leader of a school reform  effort in Connecticut, dubbed ConnCAN, (short for Connecticut Coalition for Achievement Now), and then  a group discussion with  prominent Minnesota education innovators and key leaders of the state's African-American community.  I attended the June event and was impressed by the strong focus on the compelling facts of under-achievement by racial minorities and low-income students in many schools and the seeming inability of the public education system to reverse those trends.   One of Johnston's more provocative assertions raised this question:  Instead of always saying we can't fix our schools or expect better results from poor kids until we fix poverty, might the opposite be more true, that we can't fix poverty unless we improve teacher quality and fix the schools?

Our own analysis and set of prescriptions for improving educational attainment and reducing the gaps in Minnesota does include  improvements in teacher quality and other school reforms as promising interventions.   Our Smart Investments in Minnesota's Students agenda  also includes substantial pre-school  investments in early childhood education and it offers a comprehensive approach that begins before birth and continues through successful post-secondary degree completion.    But a more  singular focus on school reforms _ with a ConnCAN-style emphasis on accountablity, choice and flexibility _ is definitely gaining momentum in Minnesota.   And a MinnCAN initiative is  likely to be front-and-center in the 2011 legislative session, regardless of who wins the elections in November.

Common ground stretches as far as the eye can see on this point:  our community and our economy are in jeopardy as a result of too many students failing and we simply can't afford year after year to allow so many kids to fall behind and for half our young adults to fail to obtain post-secondary credentials.   Impatience and frustration are justified.  Pessimism and inaction are  not.

Dane Smith

Round-up of good news and commentary for practical progressives

Here's a round-up of some particularly good fodder for practical progressives in the news recently:   

• Washington Post columnist Ruth Marcus is continuing to develop as a thoughtful centrist heir to David Broder and she really hit the mark with her recent commentary (headlined in the Star Tribune, "If taxes never go up, we go down''). Marcus nailed Gov. Tim Pawlenty for his recent statement implying that the U.S. has higher taxes than most other nations, pointing out that our overall effective federal tax rate is much lower than it was a decade ago, and lower than all but Mexico, Turkey and South Korea among the 30 major world economies. Marcus skewered conservatives for continuing to claim that tax cuts actually produce more revenue and for their perennial complaint that "whatever level taxes are at, they are too high.'' Just a couple weeks ago, Marcus took on liberals and Democrats for refusing to acknowledge that some entitlement programs might have to be trimmed.
• One of the most refreshing "good that government does'' stories in recent memory landed on the St. Paul Pioneer Press front page over the weekend. An article headlined "Minnesota air pollution:  It's not as bad as you think,'' emphasized the rather astounding good news that since the landmark Clean Air Act of 1970, emissions from industrial polluters and vehicles have been slashed by 62 percent nationally and by half in Minnesota.
• Refuting a lot of conservative anti-Europe propaganda recently, author Steven Hill placed an op-ed in the Star Tribune pointing out that Japan and Europe and their more egalitarian market economies are doing quite well compared to the United States. Hill is the author of "Europe's Promise: Why the European Way is the Best Hope in an Insecure Age.''
• Finally, we think we offered a strong rebuttal to the false claim by some conservatives that government can't create jobs, or more broadly, that government is a net drain on the economy and can only consume wealth. Our Star Tribune "Counterpoint'' piece reviewed a long history of business-building investment and job creation in the U.S. and Minnesota.

— Dane Smith