About Growth & Justice

  • Growth & Justice is a progressive think tank committed to making Minnesota's economy simultaneously more prosperous and fair. We believe that at a time of deep partisan division, Minnesotans can unite around one goal: a strong and growing state economy that provides a decent standard of living for all.

« Reverse privatization improves emergency, fire services | Main | Forced choices about government services »

September 10, 2008

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Craig Westover

Charlie --

Here is something we both agree on, but for different reasons. I don't think government should be in the business of handing out subsidies; you don't think government should be in the business of handing out subsidies for things you don't think government should be handing out subsidies for.

In principle, why is handing out a subsidy to a private business with the objective of creating jobs (but really, as Baker says, taking money from other parts of the economy) different than handing out a subsidy for light rail to (as Peter McLaughlin says) “guide development”? Both efforts aim to create jobs and promote the common good; both provide a private benefit to a few with public money from many. Both pick winners and create losers by directing money to areas where people would not freely choose to spend it. Both end up costing more in the long run than they deliver in benefits.

So what are you praising or knocking, here Charlie? The outcome or the process?

CommonSenseRambler

Ditto for Craig's comment.

Subsidies distort the market, are inherintly unfair and interfere with the ability for natural corrective measures to take place in a sustainable, competitive free market economy that is the true secret of success of the United States of America.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Blog powered by Typepad